When we were on SSRS 2000, I had to add a line in my RSWebApplication.config
file in order for people outside our firewall to access our internal report
server. It looked like
<ReportServerExternalUrl>http://xxx.mydomain.com</ReportServerExternalUrl>
We just upgraded to SSRS 2005 and I wonder if I have to add this line back
into the config file to get/keep this capability.
Thanks.I tried accessing my report server after I got home and had no problems so
the answer must be that I don't need to insert this extra line manually into
the config file. That's nice since it seemed an unnecessary step in SSRS
2000.
Jon
Showing posts with label outside. Show all posts
Showing posts with label outside. Show all posts
Sunday, February 19, 2012
Thursday, February 9, 2012
##tblTemp invisible for bcp
I did create #tblTemp on sql but can not use it with "outside" bcp routine
from command line:
Error = [Microsoft][ODBC SQL ...][SQL Server]Invalid object name '##tblTemp'.
Any idea why?
--
gokWhy do you want to BCP into a global temp table? If you are already in tsql
then why not use Bulk Insert instead? Not that I am recommending you use
temp tables but at least Bulk Insert can see a local temp table.
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"gok" <gok@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:A182DF5D-B64F-4E66-8F38-7A06EEFD6159@.microsoft.com...
>I did create #tblTemp on sql but can not use it with "outside" bcp routine
> from command line:
> Error = [Microsoft][ODBC SQL ...][SQL Server]Invalid object name
> '##tblTemp'.
> Any idea why?
> --
> gok
>|||I have a data file (from user verification in xsl) I need to import to sql.
the idea was to give client copy of bcp.exe and he will post data from his
machine to sql. In BULK INSERT I have to use shared folder to import data
from file, otherwise this file still "invisible" for sql (I was trying query
analyzer on non-sql machine).
What would be a correct way to append data from file?
"Andrew J. Kelly" wrote:
> Why do you want to BCP into a global temp table? If you are already in ts
ql
> then why not use Bulk Insert instead? Not that I am recommending you use
> temp tables but at least Bulk Insert can see a local temp table.
> --
> Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
>
> "gok" <gok@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:A182DF5D-B64F-4E66-8F38-7A06EEFD6159@.microsoft.com...
>
>|||The correct way is dependant on your needs. But I would never want to give
a client direct permission to import a file with BCP to my production
server. Why not have them FTP it to a secure folder on your server or
somewhere the server can get to it. Then use Bluk Insert to load it.
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"gok" <gok@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:105F0D2F-92B5-427A-96FB-F17BEAABE17F@.microsoft.com...
>I have a data file (from user verification in xsl) I need to import to sql.
> the idea was to give client copy of bcp.exe and he will post data from his
> machine to sql. In BULK INSERT I have to use shared folder to import data
> from file, otherwise this file still "invisible" for sql (I was trying
> query
> analyzer on non-sql machine).
> What would be a correct way to append data from file?
> "Andrew J. Kelly" wrote:
>|||you'r right, no reason to give bcp to user. In my case it is hidden by
front-end .exe app.
Right now I dont see any advantages to use bcp (so BULK INSERT) to upsize
data: it is not secure, it cannt handle table relations and creating temp
tables on sql side has no benefits either. Better lets bring those tree-like
data directly to dbase and make sql to do all quality control checks!
"Andrew J. Kelly" wrote:
> The correct way is dependant on your needs. But I would never want to giv
e
> a client direct permission to import a file with BCP to my production
> server. Why not have them FTP it to a secure folder on your server or
> somewhere the server can get to it. Then use Bluk Insert to load it.
> --
> Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
>
> "gok" <gok@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:105F0D2F-92B5-427A-96FB-F17BEAABE17F@.microsoft.com...
>
>
from command line:
Error = [Microsoft][ODBC SQL ...][SQL Server]Invalid object name '##tblTemp'.
Any idea why?
--
gokWhy do you want to BCP into a global temp table? If you are already in tsql
then why not use Bulk Insert instead? Not that I am recommending you use
temp tables but at least Bulk Insert can see a local temp table.
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"gok" <gok@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:A182DF5D-B64F-4E66-8F38-7A06EEFD6159@.microsoft.com...
>I did create #tblTemp on sql but can not use it with "outside" bcp routine
> from command line:
> Error = [Microsoft][ODBC SQL ...][SQL Server]Invalid object name
> '##tblTemp'.
> Any idea why?
> --
> gok
>|||I have a data file (from user verification in xsl) I need to import to sql.
the idea was to give client copy of bcp.exe and he will post data from his
machine to sql. In BULK INSERT I have to use shared folder to import data
from file, otherwise this file still "invisible" for sql (I was trying query
analyzer on non-sql machine).
What would be a correct way to append data from file?
"Andrew J. Kelly" wrote:
> Why do you want to BCP into a global temp table? If you are already in ts
ql
> then why not use Bulk Insert instead? Not that I am recommending you use
> temp tables but at least Bulk Insert can see a local temp table.
> --
> Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
>
> "gok" <gok@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:A182DF5D-B64F-4E66-8F38-7A06EEFD6159@.microsoft.com...
>
>|||The correct way is dependant on your needs. But I would never want to give
a client direct permission to import a file with BCP to my production
server. Why not have them FTP it to a secure folder on your server or
somewhere the server can get to it. Then use Bluk Insert to load it.
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"gok" <gok@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:105F0D2F-92B5-427A-96FB-F17BEAABE17F@.microsoft.com...
>I have a data file (from user verification in xsl) I need to import to sql.
> the idea was to give client copy of bcp.exe and he will post data from his
> machine to sql. In BULK INSERT I have to use shared folder to import data
> from file, otherwise this file still "invisible" for sql (I was trying
> query
> analyzer on non-sql machine).
> What would be a correct way to append data from file?
> "Andrew J. Kelly" wrote:
>|||you'r right, no reason to give bcp to user. In my case it is hidden by
front-end .exe app.
Right now I dont see any advantages to use bcp (so BULK INSERT) to upsize
data: it is not secure, it cannt handle table relations and creating temp
tables on sql side has no benefits either. Better lets bring those tree-like
data directly to dbase and make sql to do all quality control checks!
"Andrew J. Kelly" wrote:
> The correct way is dependant on your needs. But I would never want to giv
e
> a client direct permission to import a file with BCP to my production
> server. Why not have them FTP it to a secure folder on your server or
> somewhere the server can get to it. Then use Bluk Insert to load it.
> --
> Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
>
> "gok" <gok@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:105F0D2F-92B5-427A-96FB-F17BEAABE17F@.microsoft.com...
>
>
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)